A short shoot post today. The white screen syndrome is kinda hitting me at the moment. But one thing is coming to mind: the delusion of packing the complexity of multi-faceted, multi-stakeholder, multi-perspective programs into planning activities in a planning workshop of one, two or even three days.
I have recently facilitated a number of workshops (some of them listed here) for initiatives that integrate very different disciplines and arguably worldviews: social science, biophysical science, economics, mixing different fields of expertise in one same agricultural stream.
Almost every time we schedule such planning workshops, the commissioners’ expectations are that we will be able to come up with a neat action plan. This is where the delusion starts.
We can achieve a neat action plan in one workshop:
- When we have a very good idea of where we want to be
- When participants know each other very well: their strengths and weaknesses and their capacity to work together
- When participants share the same language (jargon, concepts and approaches)
- When the program relating to the workshop is straightforward and not a complex multi-stakeholder program
- When the group of participants is small (ideally 5 to 10)
If these conditions are not gathered, I doubt that one workshop can really go beyond great conversations – sometimes tense but certainly clarifying discussions – and some very draft ideas of wide streams of activities. We should tone down our expectations.
Workshops are just stepping stones towards a more coherent plan and future; they’re also bridges among worldviews; and they are wonderful opportunities to network or gel teams. That is already extraordinary and certainly most helpful in complex initiatives.
Small is beautiful. Expecting less quantity but more quality should be our guiding aspiration in (planning) workshops. Spread the word!
Related blog posts: